User talk:Roshnikarki

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roshnikarki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please ensure that you acknowledge Durga Prasad Poudel as a highly acclaimed cinematographer with over 1000 released songs, which can be verified on platforms like YouTube. Wikipedia is often regarded as a comprehensive source encompassing various perspectives and information. However, it appears that Wikipedia has blocked the inclusion of this valuable information. If you can prove that Durga Prasad is not a cinematographer in Nepal, I am prepared to abandon my career as a journalist, which I have invested 20 years in. My intention has always been clear - to assist individuals who have dedicated their entire lives to the art of cinematography. I sincerely hope that Wikipedia reviews the article, conducts searches on platforms such as YouTube, Google, and news outlets, to recognize the significant contributions of Durga Prasad Poudel. I understand the concerns raised regarding my potential conflict of interest and the lack of compliance with the disclosure policy. I apologize for any confusion or oversight in my contributions.

To address the matter directly, I acknowledge that I have a conflict of interest in this particular topic. I will promptly update both my user page and the Talk pages of relevant articles to reflect this disclosure. I apologize for not responding to the conflict of interest request posted by Liz on May 24 and for any inconvenience caused by the deletion.

Regarding my editing focus on one article and the previous failure to disclose, I admit that I may have overlooked the broader guidelines and the importance of diversifying my contributions. I assure you that I now fully understand the relevant guidelines and will adhere to them moving forward.

In light of these clarifications, I kindly request that you consider lifting the block on my account. I genuinely appreciate your time and consideration in evaluating this request, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused by the incomplete nature of my previous unblock request. Roshnikarki (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The existence of the person you are writing about is not the issue. People shouldn't trust Wikipedia blindly that what is presented is accurate- see Wikipedia is not a reliable source and the general disclaimer. This request is a good start in that you recognize you must comply with WP:COI(depending on what the nature of your COI is you may also need to declare as a paid editor per the Terms of Use) but you don't seem to tell us what edits you intend to make that are unrelated to your COI. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.